The author of this editorial argues that the Electoral College system in the United States is unfair and proposes that the Nebraska and Maine plan would be a better alternative. The Nebraska and Maine plan allocate electoral votes based on Congressional districts, rather than the winner-takes-all approach used by most states. The author believes that if every state adopted this system, it would better represent the will of the people.
The author points out that under the current Electoral College system, a candidate can win the presidency without winning the popular vote. This has happened in two out of the past five presidential elections, leading to widespread criticism of the system. The Nebraska and Maine plan, on the other hand, would ensure that each vote counts and could potentially eliminate the possibility of a candidate winning the Electoral College while losing the popular vote.
The author acknowledges that implementing the Nebraska and Maine plan nationwide would require all states to change their laws. However, they believe that it would be worth the effort in order to create a more fair and representative election system. By dividing electoral votes based on Congressional districts, the author argues that the system would better reflect the diverse opinions within each state.
In conclusion, the author advocates for the adoption of the Nebraska and Maine plan as a more equitable alternative to the current Electoral College system. They believe that by dividing electoral votes based on Congressional districts, the system would better represent the will of the people and eliminate the possibility of a candidate winning the presidency without winning the popular vote.
Source
Photo credit news.google.com